RTRP Rules Challenged

The Arlington, Virginia-based Institute for Justice, on behalf of a couple of tax preparers, is challenging the Internal Revenue Service’s authority to regulate tax return preparers. The Institute plans to sue the IRS asking for an injunction against enforcement of the new Register Tax Return Preparer (RTRP) regulations. They claim that requiring tax preparers, who are not CPAs, Attorneys or Enrolled Agents, to pass a licensing examination (there is a fee of $116 to take the exam) and attend 15 hours of continuing education courses annually, will deprive them of their right to earn a living.

Well, I can tell you from personal experience: some of them need to be deprived.

When I was growing up, my dad was a struggling small business owner. He was one of those individuals who used an unregulated tax preparer. One year, the errors the preparer made on his return were so egregious that the IRS audited the return. Because of the nature of the errors, the agent went back and audited all open years. As a result my dad received a refund of over $1,000, which was a lot of money back in the 1960s, especially for someone like my dad who had struggled each year to pay those taxes.

There are three ways the group says these new regulations will negatively impact tax preparers and their clients:

1. It will put some tax return preparers out of business.

2. It could cause a financial hardship for their lower income clients resulting from the increased fees.

3. Their clients may have to find a new tax preparer.

My responses to the group’s allegations are as follows:

1. So be it. If they can’t pass a basic competency test they should not be preparing tax returns.

2. I don’t buy this. There are half a dozen or so entities that provide free tax return preparation, including the IRS’s Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program. I realize that the free tax return preparation programs are primarily for the most basic tax returns, but if a return is more complex than a basic return you need the services of a qualified tax preparer. (See response 1 above.)

3. If they were using a qualified tax return preparer in the first place this would be a moot point, otherwise: See response 1 above.

What do you think?