On January 9, 1984 a Wendy’s TV commercial first aired touting their hamburgers as having more meat than similar competitor’s burger. Three elderly ladies stand at the pickup window of one of the competitors looking at a very large hamburger. The first lady keeps saying over and over “It certainly is a big bun.” They remove the top half of the bun to disclose a very small meat patty. Finally the shortest member of the group, a woman who could barely see over the counter, asks, “Where’s the beef?” I think we should ask Congress, “Where’s the relief?”
I don’t see how they can call a piece of legislation, “The American Tax Relief Act of 2012” (ATRA) when the Act did not extend the 2% payroll tax reduction allowing the rate to increase back to its previous level of 6.2% of wages. By not sustaining the reduced rate they have in fact increased the taxes of every working American by 2%.
Pork Provisions
It has been estimated that ATRA includes some $70 billion in “Pork Barrel” spending. Congress’s addiction to pork has given us both new and increased deductions that will add to the deficit instead of reducing it. Some of my favorites include:
• Increased rebate amounts to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands of a tax on rum imported into the US. Estimated costs $222 million.
• Quicker write off of improvements by motorsport race tracks (NASCAR). Estimate costs $78 million.
• Tax breaks for TV and movie producers that allow them to more quickly write off expenses. Estimated costs $248 million.
• Tax credits of up to $2,500 for purchasing electric powered motorcycles. Estimated costs $7 million.
Here are some of the more significant provisions included in the bill:
Alternative Minimum Tax
Probably one of the better things included in the legislation was to make permanent the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) threshold and indexing it to inflation. The new threshold amount is $78,750 and $50,600 for married and single respectively.
Capital Gains and Dividends
The current maximum tax rate of 15% on net capital gains was extended permanently at 15% except for individuals earning $450K for married filing jointly and $400K for aingle filers. For these individual the rate increases to 20%.
Estate, Gift and Generation-skipping Tax
The tax exemption for the estate, gift, and generation-skipping tax was permanently extended at $5 million per person and indexed to inflation; however, the top rate was increased to 40%.
Individual Income Tax Rates
Current individual income tax rates (10% - 35%) were permanently extended, except for those individuals making $400K or more and married joint filers making $450K or more. For these taxpayers the top tax rate is increased to 39.6% .
Personal Exemption and Itemized Deductions Limitations
The personal exemption phase-out and the itemized deductions phase-out were repealed by the Act except for taxpayers with adjusted gross income of $300K for married filing jointly, $275K for head of household, and $250K for single.
It appears that ATRA has at least put a Band Aid on the budget but has done nothing to address the long term issue of deficit spending. By trying to ignore the problem they have been successful in taking a set of complex rules and regulations (Internal Revenue Code) and made them almost incomprehensible.
What do you think?
Showing posts with label AMT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AMT. Show all posts
Thursday, January 17, 2013
Thursday, December 20, 2012
A Tale of Two Plans
The Republican plan was announced when House Speaker Boehner rejected an offer from the President that called for $1.2 trillion in new tax revenue. President Obama's offer included provisions that would have allowed most of the Bush-era tax cuts to expire for taxpayers who earned over $400,000. The President’s offer included about $1.2 trillion in spending cuts.
The White House's plan to avoid the fiscal cliff reportedly includes the following:
Although Plan B probably would not have passed in the Senate, it did provide a possible starting point for negotiations between the House and Senate that might have resulted in a compromise that would be acceptable to both chambers.
On Thursday, December 20, the Republicans cancelled the vote on their “Plan B” tax plan. The House Speaker indicated that there were not enough votes to pass the Republican bill. Apparently the bill narrowly cleared a procedural hurdle this afternoon and that made passage of the bill look unlikely. The House also recessed abruptly.
While most of the attention regarding the fiscal cliff has focused on the negotiations between Congress and the White House, the IRS is strongly urging Congress to pass the alternative minimum tax patch quickly. The IRS Commissioner said that nearly 100 million taxpayers out of the 150 million taxpayers who are expected to file could be prevented from filing their taxes until March 2013 or thereafter. This number is an increase from the 60 million affected taxpayers that the Commissioner estimated in November.
There
are barely 10 days left in 2012, and we are still waiting for Congress and the
White House to forge an agreement that would prevent more than $600 billion
dollars in tax increases and spending cuts from going into effect on January 1,
2013.
The
House Republicans were originally scheduled to bring their Plan B legislation
to the floor of the House for a vote. The bill would have raised the marginal
income tax rate on household income in excess of $1 million. The Democrats felt
that the $1 million dollar threshold was too high. The bill was unlikely to
pass in the Senate in its current state.
The
Republican bill (Plan B) would have:
- Allowed the top marginal income tax rate, capital gains rate, and dividend rate to expire after 2012 for taxpayers earning over $1 million per year. The top tax rate on ordinary income would increase to 39.6% for these taxpayers, and the top rate on capital gains and qualified dividends would increase to twenty percent (20%).
- Permanently extended the Bush-era tax cuts for taxpayers with income below the $1 million threshold
- Kept the estate tax at its current level. The current estate tax structure has a 35% top rate and a $5 million exemption. The exemption is indexed for inflation.
- Permanently increased the exemption for the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) and indexed the exemption for inflation. (It is about time that Congress ended the charade of patching the AMT exemption amounts every year or two.) This provision would have been effective for tax years after December 31, 2011; i.e., it would have been retroactive to the beginning of this year.
- Permanently increased the Section 179 expensing limitation to $250,000 and indexed the limitation for inflation after 2013. The limitation would, however, be reduced if the cost of Section 179 property placed into service during the year exceeded $800,000.
Plan
B did not include the spending cuts that House Speaker Boehner had offered in
his previous negotiations with the White House. In addition, the plan did not reinstate
the personal exemption phase-out limitations or the limitations on itemized
deductions.
The Republican plan was announced when House Speaker Boehner rejected an offer from the President that called for $1.2 trillion in new tax revenue. President Obama's offer included provisions that would have allowed most of the Bush-era tax cuts to expire for taxpayers who earned over $400,000. The President’s offer included about $1.2 trillion in spending cuts.
The White House's plan to avoid the fiscal cliff reportedly includes the following:
- Permanently extends the Bush-era tax rates for those taxpayers earning below $400,000
- Returns the estate tax to its 2009 structure when the top tax rate was 45% and there was a $3.5 million exemption per spouse.
- Raises the top capital gains rate and dividend rate to 20%
- Reinstates the personal exemption phase-out limitations and the limitations on itemized deductions for married taxpayers earning over $250,000 and single filers earning over $200,000.
- Permanently patches the individual AMT exemption amounts
- Imposes caps on itemized deductions and major exclusions for upper-income taxpayers effective in 2014.
Although Plan B probably would not have passed in the Senate, it did provide a possible starting point for negotiations between the House and Senate that might have resulted in a compromise that would be acceptable to both chambers.
President
Obama pointed out this week that he has offered a balanced deficit-reduction
plan with more than $1 trillion in spending cuts. He feels that the White House’s offer is
close enough to the Republican plan that it should be possible for both sides to
approve his plan by Christmas.
On Thursday, December 20, the Republicans cancelled the vote on their “Plan B” tax plan. The House Speaker indicated that there were not enough votes to pass the Republican bill. Apparently the bill narrowly cleared a procedural hurdle this afternoon and that made passage of the bill look unlikely. The House also recessed abruptly.
Based
upon reports earlier today, it seems unlikely that a deal will be reached
before December 25. Even if an acceptable
compromise is reached, any final vote would probably occur after Christmas.
While most of the attention regarding the fiscal cliff has focused on the negotiations between Congress and the White House, the IRS is strongly urging Congress to pass the alternative minimum tax patch quickly. The IRS Commissioner said that nearly 100 million taxpayers out of the 150 million taxpayers who are expected to file could be prevented from filing their taxes until March 2013 or thereafter. This number is an increase from the 60 million affected taxpayers that the Commissioner estimated in November.
Absent
swift congressional action, the Commissioner said that nearly 30 million
taxpayers will become subject to the AMT unless the AMT patch issue is resolved
soon. The resulting situation could cause lengthy delays in tax refunds and
unexpectedly higher tax liabilities for taxpayers who were previously unaware that
they would be subject to the AMT. Congress probably does not need to be reminded that there is a large block of
registered voters among those 30 million taxpayers.
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
The Fiscal Cliff: A Perfect Storm
What is the Fiscal Cliff and how might our country be affected? The Fiscal Cliff
is a “perfect storm” of three components: revenue increases, spending cuts, and
the spiraling debt incurred by our government—paired with Congress’s failure to
act to right any of these issues. Unless Congress acts to by the end of 2012, we
will go over the fiscal cliff, likely sending our country into a double-dip
recession. Watch this brief video with Winford Paschall, CPA, and Robin Thompson
to hear more...
Checkpoint Learning offers Fiscal Cliff CPE webinars in addition to hundreds of online and webinar tax and accounting courses; click here to check them out: http://cl.thomsonreuters.com/CourseFinder/Search?keyword=W198T,W197T
Checkpoint Learning offers Fiscal Cliff CPE webinars in addition to hundreds of online and webinar tax and accounting courses; click here to check them out: http://cl.thomsonreuters.com/CourseFinder/Search?keyword=W198T,W197T
Friday, March 16, 2012
Road to Somewhere: Tax Changes in the Senate-Passed MAP-21 Transportation Bill
When I filled my gas tank the other day, regular was still below $4 per gallon. The difference between the price I paid and $4 seems to have diminished faster than I would have preferred. Anyone who has watched the price of gasoline increase over the past year can understand why the business standard mileage rate increased from 51 cents per mile for travel during the first half of 2011 to 55.5 cents per mile for travel in the second half of 2011. As of January 1, 2012, the standard mileage rate is 55.5 cents per mile. If the price of gas continues to increase, the standard mileage rate will probably increase again.
The federal excise tax on gasoline is currently 18.4 cents per gallon, and there are 15 days left before current transportation funding and the authority to collect the federal gas tax that supports that funding expires. Congress is now paying close attention to the March 31 deadline.
The Senate voted on March 14 to pass an 18-month transportation bill, known as S. 1813, the "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act" or MAP-21. (MAP-21 sounds more like a food additive, a genome, or a distant star than the name of a bill.) Although the legislation primarily overhauls a number of federal highway-related programs, the bill does contain some important tax changes.
Here are some of the tax changes contained in the Senate-passed transportation bill. This is not a complete list.
Parity for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits. For 2011, there was parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits. The exclusion was $230 per month for each of these breaks. However under current law, for 2012, the exclusion is $240 for qualified parking (due to an inflation adjustment) but only $125 for employer-provided transit and van-pooling benefits. Under the bill, effective for months after December 31, 2011, the 2012 exclusion amount for employer-provided transit and van-pooling benefits would be increased from $125 to $240.
Funding break for employers maintaining pension plans. As a result of the current, low interest rate climate, pension plan contributions have been very high, and there is concern in Congress that this will lead to more company layoffs or pension plan freezes. Under the bill, plan liabilities would continue to be determined based upon corporate bond segment rates, which are based on the average interest rates over the preceding two years. However, for plan years beginning in calendar year 2012, for purposes of the minimum funding rules, the segment rates would be adjusted up or down, as necessary, to an amount equal to either 90% or 110% of the 25-year historic average of interest rates, whichever is closest. In today's low-rate environment, the immediate effect of this change would be to raise interest rates for funding purposes and thereby lower the minimum required pension contribution. For plan years beginning in calendar year 2013, the interest rate "corridor" would expand in 5% increments each year until it reaches 30% above and 30% below the 25-year historic average of interest rates.
AMT relief for private activity bonds. Tax-exempt interest on private activity bonds issued after the enactment date and before January 1, 2013, would not be an item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax (AMT). Additionally, tax-exempt interest on private activity bonds issued after the enactment date and before January 1, 2013, would not be included in the corporate adjusted current earnings (ACE) adjustment.
Longer write-offs for leased highway property. States may contract with a private entity to lease an existing highway or build a new one, and then operate the highway for a number of years. Although these transactions generally are structured as a lease (plus grant of a franchise permitting the private entity to collect tolls), the private entity is treated as the owner because it has the burdens and benefits of ownership. Under provisions of the bill, for leases entered into after the enactment date, the highway property would have to be depreciated over 45 years (instead of 15), and the cost of granting the franchise to collect tolls would have to be amortized over a period that is not less than the term of the applicable lease (instead of 15 years under Code Sec. 197).
Revocation or denial of passport of individuals owing more than $50,000 in back taxes. Effective on January 1, 2013, the bill would authorize the government to deny the application for a new passport or renewal of an existing passport when the individual has more than $50,000 (indexed for inflation) of "seriously delinquent tax debt." A seriously delinquent tax debt does not include a debt that is being paid in a timely manner under an agreement with the IRS or if the collection of the debt is on hold because of a collection due process hearing. The government also could revoke a passport upon reentry into the U.S. for such individuals.
In addition, the provisions of this bill allow the IRS to impose a levy of up to 100% (up from the current law's 15%) against Medicare service providers with tax delinquencies.
The bill now goes to the House of Representatives. It remains to be seen if all of the tax provisions in the Senate bill will be present in the final legislation. While the transportation bill works its way through the House, do not be surprised if the price of regular gas soon exceeds $4 per gallon. Once that threshold is exceeded, Congress may have some political incentives to add other provisions to this bill.
The federal excise tax on gasoline is currently 18.4 cents per gallon, and there are 15 days left before current transportation funding and the authority to collect the federal gas tax that supports that funding expires. Congress is now paying close attention to the March 31 deadline.
The Senate voted on March 14 to pass an 18-month transportation bill, known as S. 1813, the "Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act" or MAP-21. (MAP-21 sounds more like a food additive, a genome, or a distant star than the name of a bill.) Although the legislation primarily overhauls a number of federal highway-related programs, the bill does contain some important tax changes.
Here are some of the tax changes contained in the Senate-passed transportation bill. This is not a complete list.
Parity for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits. For 2011, there was parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits. The exclusion was $230 per month for each of these breaks. However under current law, for 2012, the exclusion is $240 for qualified parking (due to an inflation adjustment) but only $125 for employer-provided transit and van-pooling benefits. Under the bill, effective for months after December 31, 2011, the 2012 exclusion amount for employer-provided transit and van-pooling benefits would be increased from $125 to $240.
Funding break for employers maintaining pension plans. As a result of the current, low interest rate climate, pension plan contributions have been very high, and there is concern in Congress that this will lead to more company layoffs or pension plan freezes. Under the bill, plan liabilities would continue to be determined based upon corporate bond segment rates, which are based on the average interest rates over the preceding two years. However, for plan years beginning in calendar year 2012, for purposes of the minimum funding rules, the segment rates would be adjusted up or down, as necessary, to an amount equal to either 90% or 110% of the 25-year historic average of interest rates, whichever is closest. In today's low-rate environment, the immediate effect of this change would be to raise interest rates for funding purposes and thereby lower the minimum required pension contribution. For plan years beginning in calendar year 2013, the interest rate "corridor" would expand in 5% increments each year until it reaches 30% above and 30% below the 25-year historic average of interest rates.
AMT relief for private activity bonds. Tax-exempt interest on private activity bonds issued after the enactment date and before January 1, 2013, would not be an item of tax preference for purposes of the alternative minimum tax (AMT). Additionally, tax-exempt interest on private activity bonds issued after the enactment date and before January 1, 2013, would not be included in the corporate adjusted current earnings (ACE) adjustment.
Longer write-offs for leased highway property. States may contract with a private entity to lease an existing highway or build a new one, and then operate the highway for a number of years. Although these transactions generally are structured as a lease (plus grant of a franchise permitting the private entity to collect tolls), the private entity is treated as the owner because it has the burdens and benefits of ownership. Under provisions of the bill, for leases entered into after the enactment date, the highway property would have to be depreciated over 45 years (instead of 15), and the cost of granting the franchise to collect tolls would have to be amortized over a period that is not less than the term of the applicable lease (instead of 15 years under Code Sec. 197).
Revocation or denial of passport of individuals owing more than $50,000 in back taxes. Effective on January 1, 2013, the bill would authorize the government to deny the application for a new passport or renewal of an existing passport when the individual has more than $50,000 (indexed for inflation) of "seriously delinquent tax debt." A seriously delinquent tax debt does not include a debt that is being paid in a timely manner under an agreement with the IRS or if the collection of the debt is on hold because of a collection due process hearing. The government also could revoke a passport upon reentry into the U.S. for such individuals.
In addition, the provisions of this bill allow the IRS to impose a levy of up to 100% (up from the current law's 15%) against Medicare service providers with tax delinquencies.
The bill now goes to the House of Representatives. It remains to be seen if all of the tax provisions in the Senate bill will be present in the final legislation. While the transportation bill works its way through the House, do not be surprised if the price of regular gas soon exceeds $4 per gallon. Once that threshold is exceeded, Congress may have some political incentives to add other provisions to this bill.
Labels:
ACE,
AMT,
Back Taxes,
Bill,
Congress,
Gasoline,
IRS,
Leased Highway,
MAP-21,
Mass Transit,
Medicare,
Mileage,
Parking,
Passport,
Pension,
Private Activity Bond,
Tax,
Tax Debt,
Toll,
Transportation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)
